{"title":"Mark Tushnet","description":"\u003cp\u003eMark Tushnet’s works offer incisive explorations of constitutional law and judicial decision-making, inviting readers to engage deeply with the complexities of legal principles and their impact on society. His writings are particularly suited for those interested in the intersection of law, politics, and governance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWith a clear and thoughtful approach, Tushnet challenges readers to reconsider traditional perspectives on the judiciary and constitutional interpretation. His books provide valuable insight for students, scholars, and anyone drawn to critical discussions in \u003cem\u003ePolitics \u0026amp; Current Affairs\u003c\/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEducation \u0026amp; Reference\u003c\/em\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e","products":[{"product_id":"who-am-i-to-judge-by-mark-tushnet-9780300277012","title":"Who Am I to Judge?","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA leading legal scholar asks a fundamental question: Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDo we need a theory of constitutional interpretation? It is a common argument among originalists that, however objectionable you may find their theory, at least they have one, whereas their opponents do not have any theory at all. But as Mark Tushnet argues, for most of the Supreme Court's history, including some of its most exceptional periods, the Court operated without a theory.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn this book, \u003cem\u003eWho Am I to Judge?\u003c\/em\u003e, Tushnet shows us what a constitutional theory actually is; what judges need from it and why they probably can't get what they need; and the great harm that results when judges allow theory to dictate bad policy. It is not theory that matters, Tushnet argues. The vitally important, indispensable quality in a judge is good judgment.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47464780038380,"sku":"9780300277012","price":59.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780300277012-who-am-i-to-judge.jpg?v=1775054554"},{"product_id":"a-court-divided-by-mark-tushnet-9780393327571","title":"A Court Divided","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this authoritative reckoning with the eighteen-year record of the Rehnquist Court, Georgetown law professor Mark Tushnet reveals how the decisions of nine deeply divided justices have left the future of the Court—and the nation—hanging in the balance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMany have assumed that the chasm on the Court has been between its liberals and its conservatives. In reality, the division was between those in tune with the modern post-Reagan Republican Party and those who, though considered to be in the Court's centre, represent an older Republican tradition.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAs a result, the Court has modestly promoted the agenda of today's economic conservatives but has regularly defeated the agenda of social issues conservatives, while paving the way for a more radically conservative path in the future.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA Court Divided\u003c\/em\u003e by Mark Tushnet offers a compelling examination of these dynamics.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47470027866348,"sku":"9780393327571","price":29.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780393327571-a-court-divided.jpg?v=1775207217"},{"product_id":"who-am-i-to-judge-by-mark-tushnet-9780300277029","title":"Who Am I to Judge?","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA leading legal scholar asks a fundamental question: Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDo we need a theory of constitutional interpretation? It is a common argument among originalists that however objectionable you may find their theory, at least they have one, whereas their opponents do not have any theory at all. But as Mark Tushnet argues, for most of the Supreme Court's history, including some of its most exceptional periods, the Court operated without a theory.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eWho Am I to Judge?\u003c\/em\u003e, Tushnet shows us what a constitutional theory actually is; what judges need from it and why they probably can't get what they need; and the great harm that results when judges allow theory to dictate bad policy. It is not theory that matters, Tushnet argues. The vitally important, indispensable quality in a judge is good judgment.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47471938601196,"sku":"9780300277029","price":226.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/231b8b91a4e8f48de991fd8b48caa538.jpg?v=1775692617"}],"url":"https:\/\/bookhero.co.nz\/collections\/mark-tushnet.oembed","provider":"Book Hero","version":"1.0","type":"link"}